Dry/Ice: Global Warming Revealed
>>
>>by Drunvalo Melchizedek
>>
>>
>>What you are about to read is going to change your world forever,
>>this I can promise you. I actually apologize that I have to be the
>>one who brings this unsettling news, but you must know if you wish
>>to survive, for what is coming will either be DRY and heat or ICE
>>and freezing.
>>Global warming has been in the news for over 40 years, and by this
>>time we have become complacent. Our scientists have come to the
>>agreement that global warming will eventually cause major changes
>>and problems in the world, but in their way of thinking it will be
>>50 to 100 years before we will actually have to deal with the
>>effects.
>>
>>The general idea is that global warming will be slow and the world
>>will find time to discover the solutions to the problems.
>>
>>New powerful evidence strongly suggests that this scenario is
>>simply wrong, and we had better prepare for another more abrupt
>>possibility.
>>
>>DISCOVERY MAGAZINE
>>
>>One of the first hints that something may be different than what we
>>are being told (especially here in the US) was published in
>>Discover magazine in September 2002 with the cover announcing
>>“Global Warming Surprise, A New Ice Age”, “Oceanographers have
>>discovered a huge river of fresh water in the Atlantic formed by
>>melting polar ice. They warn it could soon bury the Gulf Stream,
>>plunging North America and Europe into frigid winters.”
>>That was almost two years ago, and no one listened. Life goes on
>>oblivious to the incredible danger approaching.
>>
>>ENGLAND & SIR DAVID KING
>>
>>Then in January 2004 enter Sir David King. Sir King is the Prime
>>Minister of England’s chief scientist. Sir King went to Mr. Blair
>>and told him of the impending worldwide disaster and that they
>>needed to tell the world of what was about to happen.
>>
>>Tony Blair told Sir David King to be quiet and not speak. But Sir
>>King felt that this was simply too important for him to say
>>nothing, so in January of this year he deliberately went around Mr.
>>Blair and went straight to the American journal Science where he
>>published his information and concern.
>>
>>Sir King said in this article, “In my view, climate change is the
>>most severe problem we are facing today, more serious even than the
>>threat of terrorism.”
>>
>>England placed a gag order on Sir David King, and now he is not
>>even allowed to discuss this subject publicly without threat of
>>detention.
>>
>>AMERICA & THE PENTAGON
>>
>>A month later in February 2004, the Pentagon became involved, which
>>has stirred the world to action.
>>
>>The Pentagon has been studying Global Warming for many years
>>because of its possible national security problems associated with
>>the kind of changes that could present themselves to the world
>>through Global Warming.
>>
>>A special study was conducted through one of the Pentagon’s
>>departments, the Office of Net Assessment, which is directed by
>>Andrew W. Marshall, 83, who has the responsibility of identifying
>>long-term threats to the United States.
>>
>>Mr. Marshall went to a US based think-tank called Global Business
>>Network to compile the possibilities of Global Warming on US
>>national security. A study was completed in October of 2003 and
>>released to the Pentagon, which was looking at this problem from
>>the point of view of what is the worst that could happen. It was
>>named “An Abrupt Climate Change Scenario and Its Implications for
>>United States National Security.” The summary went far beyond what
>>most Pentagon experts had expected.
>>
>>Realizing the incredible possibilities of this study, Mr. Marshall
>>made a decision to publicly report this and other information to
>>the American people. And probably because of President Bush’s
>>stance on Global Warming, which is beyond negative, he also decided
>>to go around the president, and he published his information and
>>concern in Fortune magazine on February 9th 2004.
>>
>>In his article in Fortune, Mr. Marshall explains how the melting
>>North and South poles and glaciers from around the world are
>>composed of fresh water and within this fact is the basis of the
>>impending global weather disaster.
>>
>>The Gulf Stream or scientifically referred to as North Atlantic
>>thermohaline conveyor is a stream of warm water that comes from
>>south of the equator and flows over the surface of the ocean toward
>>the north where this warm water keeps Northern America and Northern
>>and Western Europe from freezing. It also holds most of the world’s
>>weather patterns in the way we are used to.
>>
>>Then as this Gulf Stream cools down, it drops to the bottom of the
>>ocean and returns as a river in the ocean to the south where it
>>warms up again and rises to the surface and then returns to the
>>north one more time in a continuous convection current. It is a
>>huge three dimensional figure eight.
>>
>>The motor that keep this warm water flowing is found in the north
>>where the Gulf Stream drops to the bottom of the ocean. It is the
>>salt density of the ocean that causes this river to drop and pulls
>>the warm water up from the south.
>>
>>Now that the poles are melting and fresh water is flowing into the
>>Atlantic Ocean and the salt density is decreasing, the Gulf Stream
>>does not drop quiet as far, which results in a slowing down of this
>>Stream. The Gulf Stream has been dramatically slowing down now for
>>at least ten years.
>>
>>As the Gulf Stream slows down, the warmth is not brought to the
>>North Atlantic region, and the weather patterns begin to change for
>>they are dependent on this warmth to keep a balance.
>>
>>THE MELTING POLES
>>
>>The Bush Administration
>>
>>During the Bush administration when discussions have been held on
>>the melting of the North & South Poles, this government and US
>>corporate entities alike have stated that the world’s scientists
>>are all wrong on their conclusions that say there is great danger,
>>and have led the American public to believe there is no real
>>problem at all.
>>
>>However, George W. Bush was the focus of attack by Sir David King
>>when he wrote his article in Science, for the world’s greatest
>>scientific minds, at least one thousand seven hundred of them with
>>the Union of Concerned Scientists say that Mr. Bush is ill informed
>>at the least.
>>
>>Since the US government is 25% of the CO2 pollution in the world
>>that is creating Global Warming, a discussion of Mr. Bush’s Global
>>Warming policies is paramount. Perhaps one of the best articles
>>that summaries Mr. Bush’s position will be found in the ROLLING
>>STONES magazine article of May 19, 2004 by Tim Dickinson. What
>>follows in italics is a portion of this article.
>>
>>Given the imminent threat from global warming, even the Bush
>>administration might be expected to launch a War on Heat. After
>>all, as a candidate in 2000, George W. Bush vowed to "establish
>>mandatory reduction targets" for carbon-dioxide emissions, saying
>>he would make the issue a top priority.
>>Once Bush became president, however, reducing carbon emissions was
>>the first promise he broke -- and his record has been all downhill
>>from there. Only two months after taking office, the administration
>>withdrew from the Kyoto Protocol, the global treaty that the United
>>States signed in 1997 to set strict limits on greenhouse emissions.
>>Instead, Bush instituted a voluntary emissions plan that has been
>>an abject failure: So far, only fourteen companies have pledged to
>>curb their CO2 output.
>>
>>The president also folded the interagency group that monitors
>>climate change into the Commerce Department -- led by Secretary Don
>>Evans, a former oil and gas executive. And he called for additional
>>climate research that would delay any meaningful regulation for at
>>least another decade. "We do not know how much our climate could or
>>will change in the future," Bush declared in a speech in the Rose
>>Garden. Such statements spurred an open letter signed by twenty
>>Nobel laureates, who blasted the administration for having
>>"consistently sought to undermine" public understanding of man's
>>role in global warming. (Bush's science adviser refused to be
>>interviewed for this article.)
>>
>>Then the censorship began. In September 2002, the Environmental
>>Protection Agency released an air-quality report that - for the
>>first time since 1996 - included no mention of global warming.
>>Seven months later, the White House made wholesale revisions to the
>>climate-change chapter of the EPA's "Report on the Environment,"
>>playing down human influence, deleting references to the health
>>impacts of global warming and inserting climate data funded in part
>>by the American Petroleum Institute. The EPA withdrew the altered
>>chapter, acknowledging in an internal memo that it "no longer
>>accurately represents scientific consensus on climate change."
>>
>>Even some Republicans have been astounded at Bush's meddling in EPA
>>affairs. "What seems constantly evident with George W. Bush is that
>>EPA is expected to take its marching orders from the White House on
>>regulatory matters," says Russell Train, who headed the agency
>>under Richard Nixon and Gerald Ford. "During my time, I never had
>>that happen. Never." Train, a recipient of a Presidential Medal of
>>Freedom from the elder Bush, calls the administration's approach to
>>global warming "totally wrong" and "irresponsible."
>>
>>Bush can rely on key Republicans in Congress to block any efforts
>>to curb pollution and stave off disaster. Sen. James Inhofe,
>>chairman of the Environment and Public Works Committee, dismisses
>>global warming as a "hoax." In a speech last July, Inhofe compared
>>the IPCC to the Soviets and extolled the virtues of what he called
>>a "CO2-enhanced" world. "It is my fervent hope," he concluded,
>>"that Congress will reject the prophets of doom who peddle
>>propaganda masquerading as science in the name of saving the planet
>>from catastrophic disaster."
>>
>>From another point of view in the same article we hear: “They (the
>>Bush Administration) do not have a credible plan, either
>>domestically or internationally, for addressing the problem (Global
>>Warming), says Michael Oppenheimer, a climatologist at Princeton
>>University. They (the Bush Administration) argue that they don’t
>>want to address global warming, he says, ‘because the science is
>>shaky’. And that approach is indefensible, because the science
>>isn’t shaky.”
>>
>>The North Pole Melting
>>
>>Let’s look at the facts. Two summers ago the North Pole completely
>>melted for the first time in history that we know of. Both private
>>and military ships floated directly over the actual North Pole as
>>it was completely water. This area has never been seen to be less
>>then ten feet of solid ice.
>>
>>Greenpeace a few years ago announced that the North Pole’s winter
>>to summer snow pack had receded by around three hundred miles, but
>>no one listened.
>>
>>And today, as I am writing this article, we are witnessing the
>>Alaska fire that has consumed over one million acres of forest.
>>This fire is burning in an area that is always wet with rain or
>>snow until now. And this fire, as you will understand in this
>>article is directly related to the melting of the poles and the
>>Gulf Stream.
>>
>>But finally the Pentagon, thanks to Andrew Marshall, has told the
>>truth in the Fortune magazine on February 9th. The Pentagon shows a
>>satellite photo of the North Pole in 1970 and then in 2003, which
>>reveals that, according to the Pentagon, 40% of the North Pole has
>>melted in just 33 years. And it is melting faster and faster now.
>>The Pentagon has now proven that all these government statements
>>that the poles are not melting were simply a lie. And it is a lie
>>more damaging than anything that Bush’s Iraq war could possibly
>>throw at the United States.
>>
>>The South Pole Melting
>>
>>In the South Pole a couple of years ago Larsen A ledge broke off,
>>which surprised many scientists. At that time we were told by the
>>scientific personnel that were studying this event that it was no
>>big deal since this ice ledge had only been connected to the South
>>Pole for about the last ten thousand years.
>>
>>And these same scientists also added that Larsen B ledge that was
>>behind Larsen A ledge would never melt as it has been there for
>>many ice ages. Yet last year, Larsen’s B ledge broke off and went
>>to sea. These same scientists said that it would take six months to
>>melt because of its immense size, but again they were wrong. It
>>melted in a mere 35 days, and more significant, it rose the entire
>>world’s oceans by almost an inch.
>>
>>Now with Larsen’s B ledge gone, an incredibly enormous ice shelf
>>called Ross’s Shelf is exposed and the only thing holding Ross’s
>>Shelf from sliding into the ocean was Larsen’s B ledge. According
>>to my sources, Ross’s Shelf is now cracking.
>>
>>If Ross’s Shelf were to slide into the ocean, it has been estimated
>>that it would raise the entire world’s oceans by sixteen to twenty
>>feet. And that, my friends, would change the world, as almost every
>>coastal city in the world and many islands along with the county of
>>Holland would be underwater. Perhaps it will take an event like
>>this to wake up the world to become serious about Global Warming.
>>
>>THE ANCIENT PAST
>>
>>1300 AD
>>
>>The Pentagon in their study of what is now happening in the North
>>Atlantic ocean, has looked into the past to see when this slowing
>>down or stoppage of the Gulf Stream has happened before and what
>>actually took place at those time in the world’s weather patterns.
>>
>>In actual fact, this North Atlantic ocean slowing or stoppage has
>>happen hundreds of times before in the past going back hundred of
>>millions years, but in our recent past of the last 10,000 years, it
>>has only happened twice.
>>
>>The most recent time was in the year 1300 AD, and at that time it
>>simply slowed down. It never actually stopped. And why it slowed
>>down, scientists are at the moment theorizing. They don’t really
>>know why.
>>
>>It resulted in abrupt global climatic weather changes that never
>>returned to normal for 550 years. This period of time in our
>>history has been named the “Little Ice Age” because of the havoc it
>>caused to our weather and the dramatic cooling that resulted.
>>
>>What the Pentagon has realized is that at that time of the “Little
>>Ice Age”, the East Coast of America became extremely cold, while
>>the middle and Western areas of the United States became so dry
>>that the Midwest became a dust bowl and the mountain forests burned
>>to the ground, just as they are doing right now today, for you see,
>>this slowing down of the Gulf Stream has been going on today for
>>about ten years. It also affected Europe dramatically as their
>>weather changed completely during the “Little Ice Age”.
>>
>>A study of the Anasazi Indians of the 14th century is enlightening.
>>In Chaco Canyon in New Mexico the Anasazi completely disappeared,
>>and where they went no one is sure. But one of the reasons that has
>>emerged from the study of the New Mexico environment for their
>>leaving the area is that soon after the turn of the 14th century,
>>Chaco Canyon went into a drought where they didn’t receive a drop
>>of rain for 47 years! 47 years of drought will definitely cause
>>anyone to move. No water, no life.
>>
>>The archeologists who presented this study didn’t know why the
>>drought happened, but it is clear why it happened with the
>>information of the Gulf Stream slowing down just before this
>>period. And this is exactly what the Pentagon believes is about to
>>happen here in America, Canada and Europe as we speak.
>>
>>We may think that this current drought in the US West is going to
>>stop soon, but the earth’s history with the Gulf Stream suggests
>>strongly that it will continue for about another 40 years before it
>>begin to regain balance.
>>
>>8200 Years Ago
>>
>>However, the Pentagon report believes that the Gulf Stream, from
>>everything they know, is not just going to slow down, but rather it
>>is going to stop. And the last time this happened was 8200 years
>>ago.
>>
>>And according to the Pentagon, from their research, this is a much
>>more dramatic scenario. When the Gulf Stream stopped 8200 years
>>ago, it soon left Northern Europe under a half mile of ice, and New
>>York and England quickly endured weather similar to Siberia.
>>
>>Further it resulted in a true “Ice Age” that lasted about 100
>>years, and so you can see why the Pentagon is so worried. According
>>to Andrew Marshall, like Sir David King, he says that this Gulf
>>Stream problem is a greater threat to US national security (and
>>other countries’) than all of the world’s combined terrorism.
>>Really, when you think about it, terrorism is nothing compared to
>>the stopping of the Gulf Stream. It’s not even close.
>>
>>Realize that without stable weather conditions, the growing of food
>>becomes almost impossible, and according to the Pentagon, this
>>could become such a huge problem for the world in the near future,
>>that wars will begin to form all over the world, not for oil or
>>energy, but for food and water.
>>
>>And with whole countries having to evacuate, if this were to
>>happen, such as Finland, Sweden and Denmark, which will be under
>>ice, and many other countries for other reasons, this enormous
>>immigration is what will cause the most threat to national
>>security, again according to the Pentagon report.
>>
>>This is why Andrew Marshall and Sir David King wanted the world to
>>know about what was coming so that the world could begin to prepare
>>for the inevitable.
>>
>>THE US SENATE
>>
>>Then in March 2004 the US Senate became aware of what the Pentagon
>>was saying and they appropriated 60 million dollars to the study of
>>ABRUPT GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGES. This offers hope that soon the US
>>Senate will begin to tell the world of these coming climate
>>changes.
>>
>>THE UNITED NATIONS
>>
>>In June 2004, ending on June 29th, a meeting was held at the United
>>Nations to consider what to do about Global Warming and the Gulf
>>Stream. 154 countries participated with the result that the only
>>thing they could figure out what to do was to eliminate the use of
>>oil and gasoline as soon as possible.
>>
>>There are those who believe that if we continue to lower the CO2
>>levels, that possibly we can slow down the problems, and, of
>>course, we must do everything we can. This is important for there
>>are ocean currents other that the North Atlantic that are in every
>>ocean, and if they all were to stop or slow down, Earth would all
>>most certainly enter a true ice age. And history has shown that if
>>that were to happen, our civilization would not return to a warm
>>period again for 90,000 years.
>>
>>But really, to change or increase the current of the entire
>>Atlantic ocean to bring it back to “normal” is beyond the
>>possibilities of the human race and all of it’s technologies. It is
>>too late, by the estimate of most of the world’s scientists, to
>>alter the course of what is about to happen. All we can do now is
>>prepare for the shock. And preparation is essential, which is the
>>main message of both Sir David King and Andrew Marshall.
>>
>>NASA PREPARES
>>
>>On July 13th, 2004, NASA launched a satellite, the first of three,
>>that’s whole purpose is to study Global Warming. Besides the study
>>of the ozone, another huge problem associated with Global Warming,
>>these satellites will monitor the temperature and salt density of
>>the oceans. Perhaps we will at least be able to monitor the rapid
>>changes and predict what will happen next.
>>
>>SOME UNUSUAL WEATHER CHANGES THAT HAVE HAPPENED
>>SINCE THE GULF STREAM SLOWED DOWN
>>
>>In March 2004 the world saw a major hurricane hit the coast of
>>Brazil. This is the first time in all recorded history that a
>>hurricane has struck land in South America.
>>
>>In May 2004, the United States witnessed 562 tornadoes in a single
>>month, breaking all records. A few of these tornadoes were recorded
>>in Seattle, Washington. Never has a tornado been seen in Seattle.
>>
>>Eastern Canada in the winter of 2003/2004 just had one of the
>>coldest winters on record.
>>
>>For several years forest fires have been burning around the world.
>>The list would be extensive. The north part of Australia is on
>>fire. Alaska, as we have already mentioned, is burning.
>>Unprecedented!
>>The entire Western United States is under fire, jumping from region
>>to region, with the US government announcing that this is the worse
>>drought in 500 years. Really, the fires are worldwide.
>>
>>France and Europe had a heat wave in 2003 that caused 15,000 people
>>to die in France and 30,000 through-out Europe simply from the
>>intense heat caused by Global Warming and the Gulf Stream.
>>
>>Argentina this month July 2004, had the greatest storm they have
>>ever seen in their history.
>>
>>Mexico’s weather is so strange and wet in some regions that
>>mold/fungus is forming on their crops. (And in other regions they
>>are having a drought) As weather patterns begin to change more and
>>more radically, food growth will become one of our biggest
>>problems.
>>
>>The coral reefs of the world are dying because of Global Warming,
>>and this is threatening most of the islands in the oceans,
>>including those in the Pacific. Anyone living on most islands will
>>probably have to leave sooner or later because of their fresh water
>>being corrupted with salt ocean water. Definitely they will have to
>>leave if the oceans rise much higher.
>>
>>Further, it was reported on NPR this morning, July 16, 2004, that
>>fifty percent of the CO2 that has been released in the atmosphere
>>from our technological society has ended up in our oceans and this
>>in turn is dropping the PH to the acidic. This in turn is actually
>>dissolving the coral reefs and killing them along with vast numbers
>>of other life forms in the oceans.
>>
>>These are problems simply off the top of my head. If one were to
>>get serious and really research all the strange weather problems of
>>the last ten years (the years the Gulf Stream slowed down) one
>>would begin to be truly aware of the coming abrupt global climate
>>weather changes that we must all adapt to if humanity is to
>>continue on Earth.
>>
>>THE 40-FOOT WALL
>>
>>In the Pentagon report it suggests that the United States build a
>>40-foot wall around the entire country to keep out people who are
>>immigrating and trying to escape world weather problems. The
>>Pentagon believes that food and water will be the biggest problem,
>>and since the US has the money to buy food, they believe we will be
>>best able to resist this particular problem longer than most
>>countries. People will want to come here just to get food.
>>
>>This sounds like something out of a weird movie, but in fact the US
>>government has already begun the construction of this wall between
>>the US and Mexico.
>>
>>SIDE NOTE: Speaking of movies, The Day After Tomorrow, which was
>>recently released is based on this information of the Gulf Stream
>>stopping. However, Hollywood exaggerated the results of the storms
>>so much that most people simply thought it was fantasy. It is not
>>fantasy, it is really happening, but will it happen as this movie
>>predicts? And in this movie you saw massive amount of Americans
>>fleeing to Mexico to escape the extreme cold weather.
>>
>>I just spoke with a US military person about two weeks ago who is
>>involved in the construction of this 40-foot wall. In the
>>discussion, with him about the Gulf Stream, which he was unaware
>>of, he said, “Oh, now I understand. You see, the wall is straight
>>up and down on the Mexican side, but it has steps and ladders on
>>the US side to get over the wall and into Mexico. I never could
>>understand why the government was doing this.”
>>
>>THE CHANGING OF THE SHAPE OF THE GULF STREAM
>>
>>In the Pentagon report they said that they believed that the
>>stoppage of the Gulf Stream would probably happen in three to five
>>years from October 2003. This was their best guess, and admittedly
>>it was only a guess and a theory.
>>
>>But what they didn’t know, because it was beginning at the actual
>>time of their release of their report, was that the Gulf Stream was
>>beginning to change shape. The change of shape of the Gulf Stream
>>is the beginning of the breakdown and stoppage of this warm water
>>current and the end of our civilization as we know it.
>>
>>I have this information from two sources, both of which do not wish
>>to be named right now, but both of them are world famous
>>scientists.
>>
>>If this is true, then all the effects and timing of the Pentagon
>>report have to be shifted closer to the present by three to five
>>years.
>>
>>I don’t know if this is true, but in the vein of holding nothing
>>back, this info is placed in this article. The actual proof will
>>follow if it will be given to me.
>>
>>FROM MY HEART TO YOURS
>>
>>As I became aware of this information, I didn’t know what to do or
>>if I should write this article. But because I believe in and love
>>humanity, I finally realized, like Sir David King and Andrew
>>Marshall, that I must speak out, for knowledge is power.
>>
>>And when the time comes for us all to make life decisions, my
>>prayer is that we all go inside where God resides and listen to our
>>inner Heart. If we trust in ourselves and the presence of Divine
>>Guidance, we will all know exactly what to do and where to be.
>>
>>May God bless us all in what is about to come.
>>
>>
>>by Drunvalo Melchizedek
>>
>>
>>What you are about to read is going to change your world forever,
>>this I can promise you. I actually apologize that I have to be the
>>one who brings this unsettling news, but you must know if you wish
>>to survive, for what is coming will either be DRY and heat or ICE
>>and freezing.
>>Global warming has been in the news for over 40 years, and by this
>>time we have become complacent. Our scientists have come to the
>>agreement that global warming will eventually cause major changes
>>and problems in the world, but in their way of thinking it will be
>>50 to 100 years before we will actually have to deal with the
>>effects.
>>
>>The general idea is that global warming will be slow and the world
>>will find time to discover the solutions to the problems.
>>
>>New powerful evidence strongly suggests that this scenario is
>>simply wrong, and we had better prepare for another more abrupt
>>possibility.
>>
>>DISCOVERY MAGAZINE
>>
>>One of the first hints that something may be different than what we
>>are being told (especially here in the US) was published in
>>Discover magazine in September 2002 with the cover announcing
>>“Global Warming Surprise, A New Ice Age”, “Oceanographers have
>>discovered a huge river of fresh water in the Atlantic formed by
>>melting polar ice. They warn it could soon bury the Gulf Stream,
>>plunging North America and Europe into frigid winters.”
>>That was almost two years ago, and no one listened. Life goes on
>>oblivious to the incredible danger approaching.
>>
>>ENGLAND & SIR DAVID KING
>>
>>Then in January 2004 enter Sir David King. Sir King is the Prime
>>Minister of England’s chief scientist. Sir King went to Mr. Blair
>>and told him of the impending worldwide disaster and that they
>>needed to tell the world of what was about to happen.
>>
>>Tony Blair told Sir David King to be quiet and not speak. But Sir
>>King felt that this was simply too important for him to say
>>nothing, so in January of this year he deliberately went around Mr.
>>Blair and went straight to the American journal Science where he
>>published his information and concern.
>>
>>Sir King said in this article, “In my view, climate change is the
>>most severe problem we are facing today, more serious even than the
>>threat of terrorism.”
>>
>>England placed a gag order on Sir David King, and now he is not
>>even allowed to discuss this subject publicly without threat of
>>detention.
>>
>>AMERICA & THE PENTAGON
>>
>>A month later in February 2004, the Pentagon became involved, which
>>has stirred the world to action.
>>
>>The Pentagon has been studying Global Warming for many years
>>because of its possible national security problems associated with
>>the kind of changes that could present themselves to the world
>>through Global Warming.
>>
>>A special study was conducted through one of the Pentagon’s
>>departments, the Office of Net Assessment, which is directed by
>>Andrew W. Marshall, 83, who has the responsibility of identifying
>>long-term threats to the United States.
>>
>>Mr. Marshall went to a US based think-tank called Global Business
>>Network to compile the possibilities of Global Warming on US
>>national security. A study was completed in October of 2003 and
>>released to the Pentagon, which was looking at this problem from
>>the point of view of what is the worst that could happen. It was
>>named “An Abrupt Climate Change Scenario and Its Implications for
>>United States National Security.” The summary went far beyond what
>>most Pentagon experts had expected.
>>
>>Realizing the incredible possibilities of this study, Mr. Marshall
>>made a decision to publicly report this and other information to
>>the American people. And probably because of President Bush’s
>>stance on Global Warming, which is beyond negative, he also decided
>>to go around the president, and he published his information and
>>concern in Fortune magazine on February 9th 2004.
>>
>>In his article in Fortune, Mr. Marshall explains how the melting
>>North and South poles and glaciers from around the world are
>>composed of fresh water and within this fact is the basis of the
>>impending global weather disaster.
>>
>>The Gulf Stream or scientifically referred to as North Atlantic
>>thermohaline conveyor is a stream of warm water that comes from
>>south of the equator and flows over the surface of the ocean toward
>>the north where this warm water keeps Northern America and Northern
>>and Western Europe from freezing. It also holds most of the world’s
>>weather patterns in the way we are used to.
>>
>>Then as this Gulf Stream cools down, it drops to the bottom of the
>>ocean and returns as a river in the ocean to the south where it
>>warms up again and rises to the surface and then returns to the
>>north one more time in a continuous convection current. It is a
>>huge three dimensional figure eight.
>>
>>The motor that keep this warm water flowing is found in the north
>>where the Gulf Stream drops to the bottom of the ocean. It is the
>>salt density of the ocean that causes this river to drop and pulls
>>the warm water up from the south.
>>
>>Now that the poles are melting and fresh water is flowing into the
>>Atlantic Ocean and the salt density is decreasing, the Gulf Stream
>>does not drop quiet as far, which results in a slowing down of this
>>Stream. The Gulf Stream has been dramatically slowing down now for
>>at least ten years.
>>
>>As the Gulf Stream slows down, the warmth is not brought to the
>>North Atlantic region, and the weather patterns begin to change for
>>they are dependent on this warmth to keep a balance.
>>
>>THE MELTING POLES
>>
>>The Bush Administration
>>
>>During the Bush administration when discussions have been held on
>>the melting of the North & South Poles, this government and US
>>corporate entities alike have stated that the world’s scientists
>>are all wrong on their conclusions that say there is great danger,
>>and have led the American public to believe there is no real
>>problem at all.
>>
>>However, George W. Bush was the focus of attack by Sir David King
>>when he wrote his article in Science, for the world’s greatest
>>scientific minds, at least one thousand seven hundred of them with
>>the Union of Concerned Scientists say that Mr. Bush is ill informed
>>at the least.
>>
>>Since the US government is 25% of the CO2 pollution in the world
>>that is creating Global Warming, a discussion of Mr. Bush’s Global
>>Warming policies is paramount. Perhaps one of the best articles
>>that summaries Mr. Bush’s position will be found in the ROLLING
>>STONES magazine article of May 19, 2004 by Tim Dickinson. What
>>follows in italics is a portion of this article.
>>
>>Given the imminent threat from global warming, even the Bush
>>administration might be expected to launch a War on Heat. After
>>all, as a candidate in 2000, George W. Bush vowed to "establish
>>mandatory reduction targets" for carbon-dioxide emissions, saying
>>he would make the issue a top priority.
>>Once Bush became president, however, reducing carbon emissions was
>>the first promise he broke -- and his record has been all downhill
>>from there. Only two months after taking office, the administration
>>withdrew from the Kyoto Protocol, the global treaty that the United
>>States signed in 1997 to set strict limits on greenhouse emissions.
>>Instead, Bush instituted a voluntary emissions plan that has been
>>an abject failure: So far, only fourteen companies have pledged to
>>curb their CO2 output.
>>
>>The president also folded the interagency group that monitors
>>climate change into the Commerce Department -- led by Secretary Don
>>Evans, a former oil and gas executive. And he called for additional
>>climate research that would delay any meaningful regulation for at
>>least another decade. "We do not know how much our climate could or
>>will change in the future," Bush declared in a speech in the Rose
>>Garden. Such statements spurred an open letter signed by twenty
>>Nobel laureates, who blasted the administration for having
>>"consistently sought to undermine" public understanding of man's
>>role in global warming. (Bush's science adviser refused to be
>>interviewed for this article.)
>>
>>Then the censorship began. In September 2002, the Environmental
>>Protection Agency released an air-quality report that - for the
>>first time since 1996 - included no mention of global warming.
>>Seven months later, the White House made wholesale revisions to the
>>climate-change chapter of the EPA's "Report on the Environment,"
>>playing down human influence, deleting references to the health
>>impacts of global warming and inserting climate data funded in part
>>by the American Petroleum Institute. The EPA withdrew the altered
>>chapter, acknowledging in an internal memo that it "no longer
>>accurately represents scientific consensus on climate change."
>>
>>Even some Republicans have been astounded at Bush's meddling in EPA
>>affairs. "What seems constantly evident with George W. Bush is that
>>EPA is expected to take its marching orders from the White House on
>>regulatory matters," says Russell Train, who headed the agency
>>under Richard Nixon and Gerald Ford. "During my time, I never had
>>that happen. Never." Train, a recipient of a Presidential Medal of
>>Freedom from the elder Bush, calls the administration's approach to
>>global warming "totally wrong" and "irresponsible."
>>
>>Bush can rely on key Republicans in Congress to block any efforts
>>to curb pollution and stave off disaster. Sen. James Inhofe,
>>chairman of the Environment and Public Works Committee, dismisses
>>global warming as a "hoax." In a speech last July, Inhofe compared
>>the IPCC to the Soviets and extolled the virtues of what he called
>>a "CO2-enhanced" world. "It is my fervent hope," he concluded,
>>"that Congress will reject the prophets of doom who peddle
>>propaganda masquerading as science in the name of saving the planet
>>from catastrophic disaster."
>>
>>From another point of view in the same article we hear: “They (the
>>Bush Administration) do not have a credible plan, either
>>domestically or internationally, for addressing the problem (Global
>>Warming), says Michael Oppenheimer, a climatologist at Princeton
>>University. They (the Bush Administration) argue that they don’t
>>want to address global warming, he says, ‘because the science is
>>shaky’. And that approach is indefensible, because the science
>>isn’t shaky.”
>>
>>The North Pole Melting
>>
>>Let’s look at the facts. Two summers ago the North Pole completely
>>melted for the first time in history that we know of. Both private
>>and military ships floated directly over the actual North Pole as
>>it was completely water. This area has never been seen to be less
>>then ten feet of solid ice.
>>
>>Greenpeace a few years ago announced that the North Pole’s winter
>>to summer snow pack had receded by around three hundred miles, but
>>no one listened.
>>
>>And today, as I am writing this article, we are witnessing the
>>Alaska fire that has consumed over one million acres of forest.
>>This fire is burning in an area that is always wet with rain or
>>snow until now. And this fire, as you will understand in this
>>article is directly related to the melting of the poles and the
>>Gulf Stream.
>>
>>But finally the Pentagon, thanks to Andrew Marshall, has told the
>>truth in the Fortune magazine on February 9th. The Pentagon shows a
>>satellite photo of the North Pole in 1970 and then in 2003, which
>>reveals that, according to the Pentagon, 40% of the North Pole has
>>melted in just 33 years. And it is melting faster and faster now.
>>The Pentagon has now proven that all these government statements
>>that the poles are not melting were simply a lie. And it is a lie
>>more damaging than anything that Bush’s Iraq war could possibly
>>throw at the United States.
>>
>>The South Pole Melting
>>
>>In the South Pole a couple of years ago Larsen A ledge broke off,
>>which surprised many scientists. At that time we were told by the
>>scientific personnel that were studying this event that it was no
>>big deal since this ice ledge had only been connected to the South
>>Pole for about the last ten thousand years.
>>
>>And these same scientists also added that Larsen B ledge that was
>>behind Larsen A ledge would never melt as it has been there for
>>many ice ages. Yet last year, Larsen’s B ledge broke off and went
>>to sea. These same scientists said that it would take six months to
>>melt because of its immense size, but again they were wrong. It
>>melted in a mere 35 days, and more significant, it rose the entire
>>world’s oceans by almost an inch.
>>
>>Now with Larsen’s B ledge gone, an incredibly enormous ice shelf
>>called Ross’s Shelf is exposed and the only thing holding Ross’s
>>Shelf from sliding into the ocean was Larsen’s B ledge. According
>>to my sources, Ross’s Shelf is now cracking.
>>
>>If Ross’s Shelf were to slide into the ocean, it has been estimated
>>that it would raise the entire world’s oceans by sixteen to twenty
>>feet. And that, my friends, would change the world, as almost every
>>coastal city in the world and many islands along with the county of
>>Holland would be underwater. Perhaps it will take an event like
>>this to wake up the world to become serious about Global Warming.
>>
>>THE ANCIENT PAST
>>
>>1300 AD
>>
>>The Pentagon in their study of what is now happening in the North
>>Atlantic ocean, has looked into the past to see when this slowing
>>down or stoppage of the Gulf Stream has happened before and what
>>actually took place at those time in the world’s weather patterns.
>>
>>In actual fact, this North Atlantic ocean slowing or stoppage has
>>happen hundreds of times before in the past going back hundred of
>>millions years, but in our recent past of the last 10,000 years, it
>>has only happened twice.
>>
>>The most recent time was in the year 1300 AD, and at that time it
>>simply slowed down. It never actually stopped. And why it slowed
>>down, scientists are at the moment theorizing. They don’t really
>>know why.
>>
>>It resulted in abrupt global climatic weather changes that never
>>returned to normal for 550 years. This period of time in our
>>history has been named the “Little Ice Age” because of the havoc it
>>caused to our weather and the dramatic cooling that resulted.
>>
>>What the Pentagon has realized is that at that time of the “Little
>>Ice Age”, the East Coast of America became extremely cold, while
>>the middle and Western areas of the United States became so dry
>>that the Midwest became a dust bowl and the mountain forests burned
>>to the ground, just as they are doing right now today, for you see,
>>this slowing down of the Gulf Stream has been going on today for
>>about ten years. It also affected Europe dramatically as their
>>weather changed completely during the “Little Ice Age”.
>>
>>A study of the Anasazi Indians of the 14th century is enlightening.
>>In Chaco Canyon in New Mexico the Anasazi completely disappeared,
>>and where they went no one is sure. But one of the reasons that has
>>emerged from the study of the New Mexico environment for their
>>leaving the area is that soon after the turn of the 14th century,
>>Chaco Canyon went into a drought where they didn’t receive a drop
>>of rain for 47 years! 47 years of drought will definitely cause
>>anyone to move. No water, no life.
>>
>>The archeologists who presented this study didn’t know why the
>>drought happened, but it is clear why it happened with the
>>information of the Gulf Stream slowing down just before this
>>period. And this is exactly what the Pentagon believes is about to
>>happen here in America, Canada and Europe as we speak.
>>
>>We may think that this current drought in the US West is going to
>>stop soon, but the earth’s history with the Gulf Stream suggests
>>strongly that it will continue for about another 40 years before it
>>begin to regain balance.
>>
>>8200 Years Ago
>>
>>However, the Pentagon report believes that the Gulf Stream, from
>>everything they know, is not just going to slow down, but rather it
>>is going to stop. And the last time this happened was 8200 years
>>ago.
>>
>>And according to the Pentagon, from their research, this is a much
>>more dramatic scenario. When the Gulf Stream stopped 8200 years
>>ago, it soon left Northern Europe under a half mile of ice, and New
>>York and England quickly endured weather similar to Siberia.
>>
>>Further it resulted in a true “Ice Age” that lasted about 100
>>years, and so you can see why the Pentagon is so worried. According
>>to Andrew Marshall, like Sir David King, he says that this Gulf
>>Stream problem is a greater threat to US national security (and
>>other countries’) than all of the world’s combined terrorism.
>>Really, when you think about it, terrorism is nothing compared to
>>the stopping of the Gulf Stream. It’s not even close.
>>
>>Realize that without stable weather conditions, the growing of food
>>becomes almost impossible, and according to the Pentagon, this
>>could become such a huge problem for the world in the near future,
>>that wars will begin to form all over the world, not for oil or
>>energy, but for food and water.
>>
>>And with whole countries having to evacuate, if this were to
>>happen, such as Finland, Sweden and Denmark, which will be under
>>ice, and many other countries for other reasons, this enormous
>>immigration is what will cause the most threat to national
>>security, again according to the Pentagon report.
>>
>>This is why Andrew Marshall and Sir David King wanted the world to
>>know about what was coming so that the world could begin to prepare
>>for the inevitable.
>>
>>THE US SENATE
>>
>>Then in March 2004 the US Senate became aware of what the Pentagon
>>was saying and they appropriated 60 million dollars to the study of
>>ABRUPT GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGES. This offers hope that soon the US
>>Senate will begin to tell the world of these coming climate
>>changes.
>>
>>THE UNITED NATIONS
>>
>>In June 2004, ending on June 29th, a meeting was held at the United
>>Nations to consider what to do about Global Warming and the Gulf
>>Stream. 154 countries participated with the result that the only
>>thing they could figure out what to do was to eliminate the use of
>>oil and gasoline as soon as possible.
>>
>>There are those who believe that if we continue to lower the CO2
>>levels, that possibly we can slow down the problems, and, of
>>course, we must do everything we can. This is important for there
>>are ocean currents other that the North Atlantic that are in every
>>ocean, and if they all were to stop or slow down, Earth would all
>>most certainly enter a true ice age. And history has shown that if
>>that were to happen, our civilization would not return to a warm
>>period again for 90,000 years.
>>
>>But really, to change or increase the current of the entire
>>Atlantic ocean to bring it back to “normal” is beyond the
>>possibilities of the human race and all of it’s technologies. It is
>>too late, by the estimate of most of the world’s scientists, to
>>alter the course of what is about to happen. All we can do now is
>>prepare for the shock. And preparation is essential, which is the
>>main message of both Sir David King and Andrew Marshall.
>>
>>NASA PREPARES
>>
>>On July 13th, 2004, NASA launched a satellite, the first of three,
>>that’s whole purpose is to study Global Warming. Besides the study
>>of the ozone, another huge problem associated with Global Warming,
>>these satellites will monitor the temperature and salt density of
>>the oceans. Perhaps we will at least be able to monitor the rapid
>>changes and predict what will happen next.
>>
>>SOME UNUSUAL WEATHER CHANGES THAT HAVE HAPPENED
>>SINCE THE GULF STREAM SLOWED DOWN
>>
>>In March 2004 the world saw a major hurricane hit the coast of
>>Brazil. This is the first time in all recorded history that a
>>hurricane has struck land in South America.
>>
>>In May 2004, the United States witnessed 562 tornadoes in a single
>>month, breaking all records. A few of these tornadoes were recorded
>>in Seattle, Washington. Never has a tornado been seen in Seattle.
>>
>>Eastern Canada in the winter of 2003/2004 just had one of the
>>coldest winters on record.
>>
>>For several years forest fires have been burning around the world.
>>The list would be extensive. The north part of Australia is on
>>fire. Alaska, as we have already mentioned, is burning.
>>Unprecedented!
>>The entire Western United States is under fire, jumping from region
>>to region, with the US government announcing that this is the worse
>>drought in 500 years. Really, the fires are worldwide.
>>
>>France and Europe had a heat wave in 2003 that caused 15,000 people
>>to die in France and 30,000 through-out Europe simply from the
>>intense heat caused by Global Warming and the Gulf Stream.
>>
>>Argentina this month July 2004, had the greatest storm they have
>>ever seen in their history.
>>
>>Mexico’s weather is so strange and wet in some regions that
>>mold/fungus is forming on their crops. (And in other regions they
>>are having a drought) As weather patterns begin to change more and
>>more radically, food growth will become one of our biggest
>>problems.
>>
>>The coral reefs of the world are dying because of Global Warming,
>>and this is threatening most of the islands in the oceans,
>>including those in the Pacific. Anyone living on most islands will
>>probably have to leave sooner or later because of their fresh water
>>being corrupted with salt ocean water. Definitely they will have to
>>leave if the oceans rise much higher.
>>
>>Further, it was reported on NPR this morning, July 16, 2004, that
>>fifty percent of the CO2 that has been released in the atmosphere
>>from our technological society has ended up in our oceans and this
>>in turn is dropping the PH to the acidic. This in turn is actually
>>dissolving the coral reefs and killing them along with vast numbers
>>of other life forms in the oceans.
>>
>>These are problems simply off the top of my head. If one were to
>>get serious and really research all the strange weather problems of
>>the last ten years (the years the Gulf Stream slowed down) one
>>would begin to be truly aware of the coming abrupt global climate
>>weather changes that we must all adapt to if humanity is to
>>continue on Earth.
>>
>>THE 40-FOOT WALL
>>
>>In the Pentagon report it suggests that the United States build a
>>40-foot wall around the entire country to keep out people who are
>>immigrating and trying to escape world weather problems. The
>>Pentagon believes that food and water will be the biggest problem,
>>and since the US has the money to buy food, they believe we will be
>>best able to resist this particular problem longer than most
>>countries. People will want to come here just to get food.
>>
>>This sounds like something out of a weird movie, but in fact the US
>>government has already begun the construction of this wall between
>>the US and Mexico.
>>
>>SIDE NOTE: Speaking of movies, The Day After Tomorrow, which was
>>recently released is based on this information of the Gulf Stream
>>stopping. However, Hollywood exaggerated the results of the storms
>>so much that most people simply thought it was fantasy. It is not
>>fantasy, it is really happening, but will it happen as this movie
>>predicts? And in this movie you saw massive amount of Americans
>>fleeing to Mexico to escape the extreme cold weather.
>>
>>I just spoke with a US military person about two weeks ago who is
>>involved in the construction of this 40-foot wall. In the
>>discussion, with him about the Gulf Stream, which he was unaware
>>of, he said, “Oh, now I understand. You see, the wall is straight
>>up and down on the Mexican side, but it has steps and ladders on
>>the US side to get over the wall and into Mexico. I never could
>>understand why the government was doing this.”
>>
>>THE CHANGING OF THE SHAPE OF THE GULF STREAM
>>
>>In the Pentagon report they said that they believed that the
>>stoppage of the Gulf Stream would probably happen in three to five
>>years from October 2003. This was their best guess, and admittedly
>>it was only a guess and a theory.
>>
>>But what they didn’t know, because it was beginning at the actual
>>time of their release of their report, was that the Gulf Stream was
>>beginning to change shape. The change of shape of the Gulf Stream
>>is the beginning of the breakdown and stoppage of this warm water
>>current and the end of our civilization as we know it.
>>
>>I have this information from two sources, both of which do not wish
>>to be named right now, but both of them are world famous
>>scientists.
>>
>>If this is true, then all the effects and timing of the Pentagon
>>report have to be shifted closer to the present by three to five
>>years.
>>
>>I don’t know if this is true, but in the vein of holding nothing
>>back, this info is placed in this article. The actual proof will
>>follow if it will be given to me.
>>
>>FROM MY HEART TO YOURS
>>
>>As I became aware of this information, I didn’t know what to do or
>>if I should write this article. But because I believe in and love
>>humanity, I finally realized, like Sir David King and Andrew
>>Marshall, that I must speak out, for knowledge is power.
>>
>>And when the time comes for us all to make life decisions, my
>>prayer is that we all go inside where God resides and listen to our
>>inner Heart. If we trust in ourselves and the presence of Divine
>>Guidance, we will all know exactly what to do and where to be.
>>
>>May God bless us all in what is about to come.
>>
